Live webinar series: Monthly Demo Day with AutonomyAI leaders and product, design & engineering guests. Sign up →
Try Playground

What Commit Offshore stopped asking its senior engineers to do

Guy Leshno

Every software services company runs on the same equation. Engineers are expensive, client timelines are fixed, and margin is whatever’s left between the two. Who does which work is a P&L question.

Commit Offshore lives inside that equation at scale. It’s the distributed software development arm of Commit, one of Israel’s largest technology companies, with hundreds of engineers delivering bespoke software across finance, manufacturing, and enterprise SaaS. At that scale, delivery efficiency translates directly into client outcomes and margins.

AutonomyAI and Commit

And across engagements, their teams kept hitting the same dynamic: feature work. New views, component updates, dashboard iterations, the interface catching up to the spec. It’s the work clients see and judge you by. It’s also the work that quietly consumes capacity you hired for harder problems.

“When you’re delivering custom software for a client, a huge number of hours goes into building and refining features. Iterations, design feedback cycles, getting the interface to match the spec. It’s work that has to be done, but it doesn’t always require the most senior people on the team to do it. The question was always how to move faster without compromising the quality our clients expect.”

Evgeny Golubov, CEO of Commit Offshore

The bar: it has to work in someone else’s codebase

A services organization can’t evaluate AI tooling the way a startup building from scratch does. Every engagement is an existing codebase with established conventions, and a delivery timeline that leaves no room for extended iteration cycles. Generic code generation tools that don’t understand established patterns create more work than they save. Engineers end up rewriting the output to fit the codebase instead of merging it.

That was the bar Commit Offshore set when evaluating Fei Studio.

“What we needed was something that could read an existing repo, understand how the team had been building, and produce code that fit and didn’t need cleanup before it was useful. Fei did that. It picked up the patterns, the component structure, the conventions already in place. The output looked like it came from someone who had been on the project from day one.”

Evgeny Golubov, CEO of Commit Offshore

What the workflow looks like now

Fei Studio is part of Commit Offshore’s standard delivery workflow. For feature work, teams scope the change, run it through Fei, and bring the resulting PR into the normal review process. Senior engineers stay focused on architecture and integrations. The gate stays exactly where it was: an engineer reviews and merges every change.

The bigger shift is what happens when a client requests a change mid-engagement. That used to mean reprioritizing the sprint. Now it doesn’t.

“Clients have high expectations for delivery speed, especially on the product experience. That’s what they see every day. Being able to respond to a request quickly, without disrupting everything else in motion, changes the conversation with the client. It looks responsive. It builds trust.”

Evgeny Golubov, CEO of Commit Offshore

For a services company, that last part is the business. Delivery speed wins the engagement. Responsiveness renews it.

What changed

Feature delivery timelines are shorter. Turnaround on product-facing client requests is faster. Teams carry more work per sprint, and senior engineers spend more of their time on the high-complexity work that drives project outcomes. For an organization competing on the quality and speed of its delivery, that compounds across every engagement it touches.

The wider point

Product companies feel the delivery gap as a slow roadmap. Services companies feel it as margin. The gap is the same one: the distance between knowing exactly what to build and getting a merged, production-ready change into an existing codebase.

Any AI can generate code. A Delivery Layer knows the codebase it’s working in, the way your senior engineer does. That’s what made it viable for a services organization where every codebase belongs to a client, and it’s why the person closest to the client request no longer has to wait in line behind the sprint.

Download the full case study

about the authorGuy Leshno

Marketing Lead

Let's book a Demo

Discover what the future of product teams looks like!